BradfordFacts

Fact-checking Brad Bradford, one post at a time.

True

Bradford says Chow's letter to the Prime Minister never mentioned crime. We read all four pages. He's right.

Claim“Every chance Mayor Chow has had to take action on public safety, she's decided not to. She's made her peace with the status quo. I haven't.”

The letter runs four pages across four headed sections — affordable homes, transit, a fair fiscal deal for Toronto, and rising costs. It contains no reference to bail reform, bail compliance, auto theft, organized crime, policing, or community safety. Bradford's description of the document is accurate.

False

Bradford says Chow declined every chance to act on public safety. Eight weeks earlier, he was criticising her safety plan.

Claim“Every chance Mayor Chow has had to take action on public safety, she's decided not to. She's made her peace with the status quo. I haven't.”

"Every chance" is a universal claim, and the record refutes it: a transit safety plan, a police hiring plan Bradford cites approvingly elsewhere, two budgets that funded it, a citywide crisis-response service, and 911 response times cut by more than half. On 28 May he attacked one of those plans for neglecting Scarborough — an argument about how Chow acted, which is only available if she acted.

Missing Context

Bradford did vote for an island airport referendum. He mentioned it 64 minutes after the fight was over.

Claim“I've been clear that Torontonians need to have a say on major decisions that affect our waterfront. That's why I voted in favour of a referendum on the proposed island airport expansion. While Toronto's seat at the table should never have been taken away, I am grateful the federal government has listened to residents.”

The vote happened exactly as described. On 21 May, Bradford was one of nine councillors who voted for a referendum on the island airport, and he voted to let the motion be debated at all. But the clarity he claims consists of that vote and, as far as the public record shows, nothing else — and he first mentioned it 64 minutes after the federal government killed the expansion.

Unsubstantiated

Bradford says Toronto trains officers and loses them to better-staffed forces. The service's own budget says they're retiring.

Claim“A safe city isn't built by asking people to do more with less. My plan will hire 1,000 more police officers to serve our communities and back up existing officers.”

TPS attributes its rising separations to a demographic bulge: officers hired in the mid-1990s, after the hiring freezes of the late 1980s, reaching retirement age now. Neither the 2025 nor the 2026 budget notes mention other police services at all, and 2025 separations came in below forecast. Officers may well leave for other forces — but nothing published shows it happening at a rate worth building a policy on.